Re: [PATCH 3/8] netfilter: Convert print_tuple functions to return void

[Joe Perches]

On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 00:23 +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:24:29PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Since adding a new function to seq_file (seq_has_overflowed())
> > there isn't any value for functions called from seq_show to
> > return anything.   Remove the int returns of the various
> > print_tuple/<foo>_print_tuple functions.
[]
> I replied to this yesterday, but it seems some spam filter also
> munched it. One comment below.
> 
> > @@ -202,9 +203,8 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> >  	if (l4proto->print_conntrack)
> >  		l4proto->print_conntrack(s, ct);
> >  
> > -	if (print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
> > -			l3proto, l4proto))
> > -		goto release;
> > +	print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
> > +		    l3proto, l4proto);
> >  
> >  	if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL))
> >  		goto release;
> 
> seq_print_acct returns seq_printf which is now void. I guess you have
> to remove this check too.

seq_printf shouldn't be void yet.
There are still other places that need conversion.

> >  	if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_REPLY))
> >  		goto release;
> 
> And here.

Eventually I trust it will be fixed, but these
patches are an intermediate step on the way there.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/