Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8

[Joe Perches]

On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> 
> This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> reversals to eliminate the array.

This one is already in -next

commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
Author: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700

    carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
    
    Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
    
    This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
    for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
    
    Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/