RE: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8

[Wang, Yalin]

> From: Joe Perches [mailto:joe@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2014 1:33 PM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'chunkeey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'linux-
> wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
> 
> On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 13:16 +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> >
> > This allows some architectures with hardware instructions for bit
> > reversals to eliminate the array.
> 
> This one is already in -next
> 
> commit 7a1283d8f5298437a454ec477384dcd9f9f88bac
> Author: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Oct 28 14:18:58 2014 -0700
> 
>     carl9170: Convert byte_rev_table uses to bitrev8
> 
>     Use the inline function instead of directly indexing the array.
> 
>     This allows some architectures with hardware instructions
>     for bit reversals to eliminate the array.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
Got it ,
So I need wait for your another patch to be accepted.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/