Re: [PATCH V4] arm64: amd-seattle: Adding device tree for AMD Seattle platform

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Monday 24 November 2014 15:51:17 suravee.suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> +	gic: interrupt-controller@e1101000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-400", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +		reg = <0x0 0xe1110000 0 0x1000>,
> +		      <0x0 0xe112f000 0 0x2000>,
> +		      <0x0 0xe1140000 0 0x10000>,
> +		      <0x0 0xe1160000 0 0x10000>;
> +		interrupts = <1 9 0xf04>;
> +		ranges;
> +		v2m0: v2m@e1180000 {
> +			compatible = "arm,gic-v2m-frame";
> +			msi-controller;
> +			arm,msi-base-spi = <64>;
> +			arm,msi-num-spis = <256>;
> +			reg = <0x0 0xe1180000 0 0x1000>;
> +		};
> +	};


Having an empty ranges property in the gic seems strange, especially
since the registers of the v2m seem to directly follow the gic's own
registers. Could you limit the ranges to only the registers that
are in the gic or its child devices itself?

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/