Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v7 09/10] tpm: TPM 2.0 FIFO Interface
From: Stefan Berger
Date: Tue Nov 25 2014 - 16:52:21 EST
On 11/11/2014 08:45 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
From: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@xxxxxxxxx>
Detect TPM 2.0 by using the extended STS (STS3) register. For TPM 2.0,
instead of calling tpm_get_timeouts(), assign duration and timeout
values defined in the TPM 2.0 PTP specification.
Signed-off-by: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index 7a2c59b..0b3c089 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
/*
* Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 IBM Corporation
+ * Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corporation
*
* Authors:
* Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ enum tis_status {
TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT = 0x08,
};
+enum tis_status3 {
+ TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM = 0x04,
+};
+
enum tis_int_flags {
TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE = 0x80000000,
TPM_INTF_BURST_COUNT_STATIC = 0x100,
@@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
#define TPM_INT_STATUS(l) (0x0010 | ((l) << 12))
#define TPM_INTF_CAPS(l) (0x0014 | ((l) << 12))
#define TPM_STS(l) (0x0018 | ((l) << 12))
+#define TPM_STS3(l) (0x001b | ((l) << 12))
#define TPM_DATA_FIFO(l) (0x0024 | ((l) << 12))
#define TPM_DID_VID(l) (0x0F00 | ((l) << 12))
@@ -344,6 +350,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
int rc;
u32 ordinal;
+ unsigned long dur;
rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, buf, len);
if (rc < 0)
@@ -355,9 +362,14 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
if (chip->vendor.irq) {
ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
+
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
+ dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
+ else
+ dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
+
Is this right? Shouldn't you call tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration for TPM2?
If not don't check the flag but leave comment for why the same function
can be called for both TPM versions.
if (wait_for_tpm_stat
- (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
- tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal),
+ (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur,
&chip->vendor.read_queue, false) < 0) {
rc = -ETIME;
goto out_err;
@@ -543,6 +555,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
u32 vendor, intfcaps, intmask;
int rc, i, irq_s, irq_e, probe;
struct tpm_chip *chip;
+ u8 sts3;
chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_tis);
if (IS_ERR(chip))
@@ -554,11 +567,28 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
if (!chip->vendor.iobase)
return -EIO;
+ sts3 = ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_STS3(1));
+ if (sts3 & TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM)
+ chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
+
/* Default timeouts */
- chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
- chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
- chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
- chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
+ chip->vendor.timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_B);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_C);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_D);
+ chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
+ usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_SHORT);
+ chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
+ usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
+ chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] =
+ usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
+ } else {
+ chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
+ chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
+ }
if (wait_startup(chip, 0) != 0) {
rc = -ENODEV;
@@ -573,8 +603,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
vendor = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_DID_VID(0));
chip->vendor.manufacturer_id = vendor;
- dev_info(dev,
- "1.2 TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
+ dev_info(dev, "%s TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
+ (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
vendor >> 16, ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_RID(0)));
if (!itpm) {
@@ -616,13 +646,17 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
dev_dbg(dev, "\tData Avail Int Support\n");
/* get the timeouts before testing for irqs */
- if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
+ if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) && tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
rc = -ENODEV;
goto out_err;
}
- if (tpm_do_selftest(chip)) {
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
+ rc = tpm2_do_selftest(chip);
+ else
+ rc = tpm_do_selftest(chip);
+ if (rc) {
dev_err(dev, "TPM self test failed\n");
rc = -ENODEV;
goto out_err;
@@ -683,7 +717,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
chip->vendor.probed_irq = 0;
/* Generate Interrupts */
- tpm_gen_interrupt(chip);
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
+ tpm2_gen_interrupt(chip);
+ else
+ tpm_gen_interrupt(chip);
chip->vendor.irq = chip->vendor.probed_irq;
@@ -759,14 +796,18 @@ static void tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
static int tpm_tis_resume(struct device *dev)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
- int ret;
+ int ret = 0;
if (chip->vendor.irq)
tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(chip);
- ret = tpm_pm_resume(dev);
- if (!ret)
- tpm_do_selftest(chip);
+ if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
+ tpm2_do_selftest(chip);
+ else {
+ ret = tpm_pm_resume(dev);
+ if (!ret)
+ tpm_do_selftest(chip);
+ }
Only a self test necessary for TPM2 if resuming from ACPI sleep?
Other parts look good to me.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/