Re: [tpmdd-devel] [PATCH v7 09/10] tpm: TPM 2.0 FIFO Interface

[Jarkko Sakkinen]

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:52:07PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 08:45 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >From: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >Detect TPM 2.0 by using the extended STS (STS3) register. For TPM 2.0,
> >instead of calling tpm_get_timeouts(), assign duration and timeout
> >values defined in the TPM 2.0 PTP specification.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Will Arthur <will.c.arthur@xxxxxxxxx>
> >Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >---
> >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> >index 7a2c59b..0b3c089 100644
> >--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> >+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> >@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> >  /*
> >   * Copyright (C) 2005, 2006 IBM Corporation
> >+ * Copyright (C) 2014 Intel Corporation
> >   *
> >   * Authors:
> >   * Leendert van Doorn <leendert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >@@ -44,6 +45,10 @@ enum tis_status {
> >  	TPM_STS_DATA_EXPECT = 0x08,
> >  };
> >
> >+enum tis_status3 {
> >+	TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM = 0x04,
> >+};
> >+
> >  enum tis_int_flags {
> >  	TPM_GLOBAL_INT_ENABLE = 0x80000000,
> >  	TPM_INTF_BURST_COUNT_STATIC = 0x100,
> >@@ -70,6 +75,7 @@ enum tis_defaults {
> >  #define	TPM_INT_STATUS(l)		(0x0010 | ((l) << 12))
> >  #define	TPM_INTF_CAPS(l)		(0x0014 | ((l) << 12))
> >  #define	TPM_STS(l)			(0x0018 | ((l) << 12))
> >+#define	TPM_STS3(l)			(0x001b | ((l) << 12))
> >  #define	TPM_DATA_FIFO(l)		(0x0024 | ((l) << 12))
> >
> >  #define	TPM_DID_VID(l)			(0x0F00 | ((l) << 12))
> >@@ -344,6 +350,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >  {
> >  	int rc;
> >  	u32 ordinal;
> >+	unsigned long dur;
> >
> >  	rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, buf, len);
> >  	if (rc < 0)
> >@@ -355,9 +362,14 @@ static int tpm_tis_send(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >
> >  	if (chip->vendor.irq) {
> >  		ordinal = be32_to_cpu(*((__be32 *) (buf + 6)));
> >+
> >+		if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> >+			dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> >+		else
> >+			dur = tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal);
> >+
> 
> Is this right? Shouldn't you call tpm2_calc_ordinal_duration for TPM2? If
> not don't check the flag but leave comment for why the same function can be
> called for both TPM versions.

No it's not right, it's a mistake. Thanks for noticing this :)

> >  		if (wait_for_tpm_stat
> >-		    (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID,
> >-		     tpm_calc_ordinal_duration(chip, ordinal),
> >+		    (chip, TPM_STS_DATA_AVAIL | TPM_STS_VALID, dur,
> >  		     &chip->vendor.read_queue, false) < 0) {
> >  			rc = -ETIME;
> >  			goto out_err;
> >@@ -543,6 +555,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
> >  	u32 vendor, intfcaps, intmask;
> >  	int rc, i, irq_s, irq_e, probe;
> >  	struct tpm_chip *chip;
> >+	u8 sts3;
> >
> >  	chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_tis);
> >  	if (IS_ERR(chip))
> >@@ -554,11 +567,28 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
> >  	if (!chip->vendor.iobase)
> >  		return -EIO;
> >
> >+	sts3 = ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_STS3(1));
> >+	if (sts3 & TPM_STS3_TPM2_FAM)
> >+		chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
> >+
> >  	/* Default timeouts */
> >-	chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >-	chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> >-	chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >-	chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >+	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) {
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_a = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_A);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_b = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_B);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_c = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_C);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_d = usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_TIMEOUT_D);
> >+		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_SHORT] =
> >+			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_SHORT);
> >+		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_MEDIUM] =
> >+			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_MEDIUM);
> >+		chip->vendor.duration[TPM_LONG] =
> >+			usecs_to_jiffies(TPM2_DURATION_LONG);
> >+	} else {
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_a = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_b = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_LONG_TIMEOUT);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_c = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >+		chip->vendor.timeout_d = msecs_to_jiffies(TIS_SHORT_TIMEOUT);
> >+	}
> >
> >  	if (wait_startup(chip, 0) != 0) {
> >  		rc = -ENODEV;
> >@@ -573,8 +603,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
> >  	vendor = ioread32(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_DID_VID(0));
> >  	chip->vendor.manufacturer_id = vendor;
> >
> >-	dev_info(dev,
> >-		 "1.2 TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> >+	dev_info(dev, "%s TPM (device-id 0x%X, rev-id %d)\n",
> >+		 (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) ? "2.0" : "1.2",
> >  		 vendor >> 16, ioread8(chip->vendor.iobase + TPM_RID(0)));
> >
> >  	if (!itpm) {
> >@@ -616,13 +646,17 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
> >  		dev_dbg(dev, "\tData Avail Int Support\n");
> >
> >  	/* get the timeouts before testing for irqs */
> >-	if (tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
> >+	if (!(chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2) && tpm_get_timeouts(chip)) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "Could not get TPM timeouts and durations\n");
> >  		rc = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto out_err;
> >  	}
> >
> >-	if (tpm_do_selftest(chip)) {
> >+	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> >+		rc = tpm2_do_selftest(chip);
> >+	else
> >+		rc = tpm_do_selftest(chip);
> >+	if (rc) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "TPM self test failed\n");
> >  		rc = -ENODEV;
> >  		goto out_err;
> >@@ -683,7 +717,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_init(struct device *dev, acpi_handle acpi_dev_handle,
> >  			chip->vendor.probed_irq = 0;
> >
> >  			/* Generate Interrupts */
> >-			tpm_gen_interrupt(chip);
> >+			if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> >+				tpm2_gen_interrupt(chip);
> >+			else
> >+				tpm_gen_interrupt(chip);
> >
> >  			chip->vendor.irq = chip->vendor.probed_irq;
> >
> >@@ -759,14 +796,18 @@ static void tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> >  static int tpm_tis_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct tpm_chip *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> >-	int ret;
> >+	int ret = 0;
> >
> >  	if (chip->vendor.irq)
> >  		tpm_tis_reenable_interrupts(chip);
> >
> >-	ret = tpm_pm_resume(dev);
> >-	if (!ret)
> >-		tpm_do_selftest(chip);
> >+	if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> >+		tpm2_do_selftest(chip);
> >+	else {
> >+		ret = tpm_pm_resume(dev);
> >+		if (!ret)
> >+			tpm_do_selftest(chip);
> >+	}
> 
> Only a self test necessary for TPM2 if resuming from ACPI sleep?

AFAIK firmware/BIOS should do TPM2_Startup according to the rules in the
section 12.2.3.2 of the Architecture specification.

> Other parts look good to me.
>    Stefan

/Jarkko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/