Re: [CFT PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: support XSAVES usage in the host
From: Wanpeng Li
Date: Wed Nov 26 2014 - 04:08:48 EST
Hi Nadav,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:00:34AM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>>> index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c2 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>>> @@ -6955,6 +6955,9 @@ int fx_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>>> return err;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fpu_finit(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
>>>>>> + if (cpu_has_xsaves)
>>>>>> + vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv =
>>>>>> + host_xcr0 | XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /*
>>>>>> * Ensure guest xcr0 is valid for loading
>>>>>
>>>>> The second version works for me (w/qemu v2.1.0; Linux 3.13 guest). I
>>
>> Could you try 3.17 guest which has xsaves enabled? Because I'm not sure if
>> the below codes from Paolo is enough to mask XSAVES, should we also add
>> F(XSAVES)?
>I guess this paragraph is intended for me. As I said before, I got limited
>access to the machine - I will not be able to run these experiments before
>Sunday, and I am not sure that I will have time to fully debug it. If you
>insist, the very least please run some experiments running a 3.16 (or older)
>guest kernel and running 3.17 with ânoxsavesâ kernel parameter.
>
>> + const u32 kvm_supported_word10_x86_features =
>> + F(XSAVEOPT) | F(XSAVEC) | F(XGETBV1);
>> +
>>
>> In addition, the 3.17 guest is still hang as I mentioned even if I add the
>> F(XSAVES) to the kvm_supported_word10_x86_features.
>>
>>>>> did not need to apply this patch on top. [although I am not sure whether
>>>>> relying on userspace to call KVM_SET_XSAVE early enough is a good practice].
>>>>
>>>> Did you actually try the patch? :) If it works, I'm tempted to apply it
>>>> anyway.
>>> Yes, I tried it both with and without this patch.
>>> Due to time constraints I only tested minimal functionality (Linux boot).
>>> I will run more tests in the near future. Anyhow, you can put the:
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Nadav Amit <namit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>>> One disclaimer: Since I got limited time with the machine, I executed
>>>>> a slightly modified kernel/qemu, and not the latest version.
>>>>> Anyhow, I donât think these differences can have any impact.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that is no problem.
>>>
>>> I am just worried that Wanpeng reported it fails, while I report it works...
>>
>> I have another patch which enable xsaves in KVM and the patch is still
>> under debug with Paolo's patch "KVM: x86: support XSAVES usage in the host",
>> so the 1/2 patch from Paolo can be dropped if my patch is ready. Anyway,
>> a quick fix is needed before enable xsaves in kvm.
>xsaves is already enabled in KVM (the host) since 3.17. It just didnât workâ
>
Not yet, it is enabled in native currrently instead of vmx and my patch
is still under debug.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
>Nadav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/