Re: [CFT PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: support XSAVES usage in the host

From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Wed Nov 26 2014 - 07:54:37 EST




On 26/11/2014 02:24, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 04:50:06PM +0200, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 25, 2014, at 16:17, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25/11/2014 15:05, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>> index 373b0ab9a32e..ca26681455c2 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>>>>> @@ -6955,6 +6955,9 @@ int fx_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>>> return err;
>>>>>
>>>>> fpu_finit(&vcpu->arch.guest_fpu);
>>>>> + if (cpu_has_xsaves)
>>>>> + vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.state->xsave.xsave_hdr.xcomp_bv =
>>>>> + host_xcr0 | XSTATE_COMPACTION_ENABLED;
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * Ensure guest xcr0 is valid for loading
>>>>
>>>> The second version works for me (w/qemu v2.1.0; Linux 3.13 guest). I
>
> Could you try 3.17 guest which has xsaves enabled? Because I'm not sure if
> the below codes from Paolo is enough to mask XSAVES, should we also add
> F(XSAVES)?
>
> + const u32 kvm_supported_word10_x86_features =
> + F(XSAVEOPT) | F(XSAVEC) | F(XGETBV1);
> +
>
> In addition, the 3.17 guest is still hang as I mentioned even if I add the
> F(XSAVES) to the kvm_supported_word10_x86_features.

Note that the point is _hiding_ XSAVES while leaving
XSAVEOPT/XSAVEC/XGETBV1 enabled. This series only fixes the problems
with xsaves in the host, it doesn't try making XSAVES work in the guest.

> I have another patch which enable xsaves in KVM and the patch is still
> under debug with Paolo's patch "KVM: x86: support XSAVES usage in the host",
> so the 1/2 patch from Paolo can be dropped if my patch is ready. Anyway,
> a quick fix is needed before enable xsaves in kvm.

Please add XSAVES to kvm_supported_word10_x86_features in your patches
instead. We still need to mask any (not yet defined) feature in bit 4
and above of CPUID[EAX=0xd,ECX].EAX.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/