Re: fs-fat: Less function calls in fat_fill_super() after error detection

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> More labels are more chances of bug (and we don't care micro optimize
>> on this error path), isn't it?
>
> I would prefer that a few jump targets can be redirected so that unnecessary
> function calls (and corresponding checks) can be avoided.

It is from real bugs in my experience, it saw several times those (mine
and other guys, in linux and others). And I think it doesn't have value
to maintain labels for micro optimization in *this error path* though.

So, if you or analyzer can check bugs by the patches affect to those
label usage in future,

Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/