Re: [PATCH v7 16/46] virtio_blk: v1.0 support
From: David Hildenbrand
Date: Mon Dec 01 2014 - 03:17:01 EST
> Based on patch by Cornelia Huck.
>
> Note: for consistency, and to avoid sparse errors,
> convert all fields, even those no longer in use
> for virtio v1.0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
>
> -static unsigned int features[] = {
> +static unsigned int features_legacy[] = {
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE,
> VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> +}
> +;
> +static unsigned int features[] = {
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_SEG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY,
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE,
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY,
> + VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ,
> + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1,
We can fit this into less lines, like done for features_legacy.
I was asking myself if we could do the conversion of the statical values
somehow upfront, to reduce the patch size and avoid cpu_to_virtio.* at those
places.
Otherwise looks good to me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/