Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] VFIO: platform: forwarded state tested when selecting IRQ handler

[Christoffer Dall]

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:39:24PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Christoffer,
> On 11/30/2014 01:47 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> > The subject reads strangely, perhaps just:
> > 
> > VFIO: platform: test forward state when selecting IRQ handler
> OK
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 07:35:55PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> >> In case the IRQ is forwarded, the VFIO platform IRQ handler does not
> >> need to disable the IRQ anymore.
> >>
> >> When setting the IRQ handler we now also test the forwarded state. In
> >> case the IRQ is forwarded we select the edge handler (no automaske).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >> - forwarded state was tested in the handler. Now the forwarded state
> >>   is tested before setting the handler. This definitively limits
> >>   the dynamics of forwarded state changes but I don't think there is
> >>   a use case where we need to be able to change the state at any time.
> > 
> > user space can change this by calling the VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER
> > whenever it wants, right?
> yes the user can set/unset the VFIO signaling (and request_irq/free_irq)
> using VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER. In this new version I do not allow
> changing the forwarded state when the handler is attached (request_irq).
> 
> Does it answer your interrogation?
> 
interrogation?  hopefully it wasn't that bad ;)

Yes, that answers my question.

Thanks,
-Christoffer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/