Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kvm: vmx: enable intel xsaves for guest
From: Wanpeng Li
Date: Tue Dec 02 2014 - 03:59:31 EST
Hi Paolo,
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:51:22AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
>On 02/12/2014 07:14, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> Expose intel xsaves feature to guest.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>> *auto switch msr ia32_xss if this msr is present
>>
>> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h | 6 +++++-
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 2896dbc..95dde42 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> int mp_state;
>> u64 ia32_misc_enable_msr;
>> bool tpr_access_reporting;
>> + u64 ia32_xss;
>
>The patch is not getting/setting ia32_xss when the guest does
>RDMSR/WRMSR. You also need a QEMU patch to migrate XSS.
Will do.
>
>> /*
>> * Paging state of the vcpu
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> index bcbfade..bdb79ef 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
>> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PAUSE_LOOP_EXITING 0x00000400
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID 0x00001000
>> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS 0x00004000
>> +#define SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES 0x00100000
>>
>>
>> #define PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK 0x00000001
>> @@ -159,6 +160,8 @@ enum vmcs_field {
>> EOI_EXIT_BITMAP3_HIGH = 0x00002023,
>> VMREAD_BITMAP = 0x00002026,
>> VMWRITE_BITMAP = 0x00002028,
>> + XSS_EXIT_BIMTAP = 0x0000202C,
>> + XSS_EXIT_BIMTAP_HIGH = 0x0000202D,
>
>s/BIMTAP/BITMAP/
Ok.
>
>> GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS = 0x00002400,
>> GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS_HIGH = 0x00002401,
>> VMCS_LINK_POINTER = 0x00002800,
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
>> index 990a2fe..b813bf9 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h
>> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
>> #define EXIT_REASON_XSETBV 55
>> #define EXIT_REASON_APIC_WRITE 56
>> #define EXIT_REASON_INVPCID 58
>> +#define EXIT_REASON_XSAVES 63
>> +#define EXIT_REASON_XRSTORS 64
>>
>> #define VMX_EXIT_REASONS \
>> { EXIT_REASON_EXCEPTION_NMI, "EXCEPTION_NMI" }, \
>> @@ -116,6 +118,8 @@
>> { EXIT_REASON_INVALID_STATE, "INVALID_STATE" }, \
>> { EXIT_REASON_INVD, "INVD" }, \
>> { EXIT_REASON_INVVPID, "INVVPID" }, \
>> - { EXIT_REASON_INVPCID, "INVPCID" }
>> + { EXIT_REASON_INVPCID, "INVPCID" }, \
>> + { EXIT_REASON_XSAVES, "XSAVES" }, \
>> + { EXIT_REASON_XRSTORS, "XRSTORS" }
>>
>> #endif /* _UAPIVMX_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> index 6a951d8..b87b5b8 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
>> @@ -1045,6 +1045,12 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_invpcid(void)
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool cpu_has_xss_exit_bitmap(void)
>> +{
>> + return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
>> + SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline bool cpu_has_virtual_nmis(void)
>> {
>> return vmcs_config.pin_based_exec_ctrl & PIN_BASED_VIRTUAL_NMIS;
>> @@ -1773,6 +1779,14 @@ static void vmx_save_host_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> kvm_set_shared_msr(vmx->guest_msrs[i].index,
>> vmx->guest_msrs[i].data,
>> vmx->guest_msrs[i].mask);
>> +
>> + if (cpu_has_xsaves) {
>> + u64 host_xss;
>> +
>> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_XSS, host_xss);
>
>Is this host value fixed? If so, please load it just once in
>setup_vmcs_config.
Will do.
>
>> + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, MSR_IA32_XSS,
>> + vcpu->arch.ia32_xss, host_xss);
>
>Also, if host_xss is fixed you can do this add_atomic_switch_msr at
>WRMSR time rather than here, and only if vcpu->arch.ia32_xss !=
>host_xss. If the two XSS values match, do clear_atomic_switch_msr instead.
Agreed.
>
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void __vmx_load_host_state(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> @@ -2895,7 +2909,8 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID |
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
>> SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
>> - SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS;
>> + SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS |
>> + SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
>> if (adjust_vmx_controls(min2, opt2,
>> MSR_IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2,
>> &_cpu_based_2nd_exec_control) < 0)
>> @@ -4346,6 +4361,7 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> unsigned long a;
>> #endif
>> int i;
>> + u64 xss = 0;
>
>#define VMX_XSS_EXIT_BITMAP 0
>
Ok.
>>
>> /* I/O */
>> vmcs_write64(IO_BITMAP_A, __pa(vmx_io_bitmap_a));
>> @@ -4446,6 +4462,9 @@ static int vmx_vcpu_setup(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>> vmcs_writel(CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK, ~0UL);
>> set_cr4_guest_host_mask(vmx);
>>
>> + if (cpu_has_xss_exit_bitmap())
>> + vmcs_write64(XSS_EXIT_BIMTAP, xss);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -5334,6 +5353,18 @@ static int handle_xsetbv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static int handle_xsaves(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>> + return 1;
>
>Please WARN(), this should never happen.
Ok.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int handle_xrstors(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>> + return 1;
>
>Same here.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> static int handle_apic_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> if (likely(fasteoi)) {
>> @@ -6951,6 +6982,8 @@ static int (*const kvm_vmx_exit_handlers[])(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) = {
>> [EXIT_REASON_MONITOR_INSTRUCTION] = handle_monitor,
>> [EXIT_REASON_INVEPT] = handle_invept,
>> [EXIT_REASON_INVVPID] = handle_invvpid,
>> + [EXIT_REASON_XSAVES] = handle_xsaves,
>> + [EXIT_REASON_XRSTORS] = handle_xrstors,
>> };
>>
>> static const int kvm_vmx_max_exit_handlers =
>>
Thanks for your review, I fix these issues in next version.
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/