On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:45:57AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I've been stuck on this kernel for a few days now trying to prove it
> > good/bad one way or the other, and I'm leaning towards good, given
> > that it recovers, even though the traces look similar.
>
> Ugh. But this does *not* happen with 3.16, right? Even the non-fatal case?
correct. at least not in any of the runs that I did to date.
> If so, I'd be inclined to call it "bad". But there might well be two
> bugs: one that makes that NMI watchdog trigger, and another one that
> then makes it be a hard lockup. I'd think it would be good to figure
> out the "NMI watchdog starts triggering" one first, though.
I think you're right.
So right after sending my last mail, I rebooted, and restarted the run
on the same kernel again.
As I was writing this mail, this happened.
[ 524.420897] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-c178:20182]
and that's all that made it over the console. I couldn't log in via ssh,
and thought "ah-ha, so it IS bad". I walked over to reboot it, and
found I could actually log in on the console. check out this dmesg..
[ 503.683055] Clocksource tsc unstable (delta = -95946009388 ns)
[ 503.692038] Switched to clocksource hpet
[ 524.420897] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [trinity-c178:20182]