Re: FIXME in solos-pci.c
From: chas williams - CONTRACTOR
Date: Thu Dec 04 2014 - 09:12:01 EST
The last I heard on this topic was from Guy Ellis,
From: Guy Ellis <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-atm-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] solos-pci.c: Fix me
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 07:34:30 +1000
Hi Chas/Nick,
I think the FIXME is reminder to deal correctly with an unknown command.
At the moment an unknown command is treated as a PKT_COMMAND which is
incorrect.
I think the correct behaviour would be to ignore unknown commands and
just free the skb.
That said I doubt this condition ever occurs, which is probably why it
has been this way since day 1.
Nathan is on vacation at the moment, when he gets back in August I'll
ask him to tidy this up.
So perhaps, Guy could let us know if he had a chance for Nathan to
look at removing this FIXME.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 22:58:46 -0500
nick <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Greetings Chas,
> I am wondering if there is any reason for the FIXME message in the below code. This is due to after reading the other parts of the function the code and logical seem similar and correct unless I am missing something about the hardware.
> Cheers Nick
> case PKT_COMMAND:
> default: /* FIXME: Not really, surely? */
> if (process_command(card, port, skb))
> break;
> spin_lock(&card->cli_queue_lock);
> if (skb_queue_len(&card->cli_queue[port]) > 10) {
> if (net_ratelimit())
> dev_warn(&card->dev->dev, "Dropping console response on port %d\n",
> port);
> dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
> } else
> skb_queue_tail(&card->cli_queue[port], skb);
> spin_unlock(&card->cli_queue_lock);
> break;
> }
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/