Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] oom: don't assume that a coredumping thread will exit soon

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Thu Dec 04 2014 - 09:34:33 EST


On Wed 03-12-14 20:50:20, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> oom_kill.c assumes that PF_EXITING task should exit and free the memory
> soon. This is wrong in many ways and one important case is the coredump.
> A task can sleep in exit_mm() "forever" while the coredumping sub-thread
> can need more memory.
>
> Change the PF_EXITING checks to take SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP into account,
> we add the new trivial helper for that.
>
> Note: this is only the first step, this patch doesn't try to solve other
> problems. The SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check is obviously racy, a task can
> participate in coredump after it was already observed in PF_EXITING state,
> so TIF_MEMDIE (which also blocks oom-killer) still can be wrongly set.
> fatal_signal_pending() can be true because of SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP so
> out_of_memory() and mem_cgroup_out_of_memory() shouldn't blindly trust it.
> And even the name/usage of the new helper is confusing, an exiting thread
> can only free its ->mm if it is the only/last task in thread group.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>

OK, I do not have a better name for the helper and code duplication
looks even worse so
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>

Andrew's additional comment makes sense as well.
> ---
> include/linux/oom.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 2 +-
> mm/oom_kill.c | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/oom.h b/include/linux/oom.h
> index e8d6e10..e16b945 100644
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ static inline bool oom_gfp_allowed(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>
> extern struct task_struct *find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p);
>
> +static inline bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> + return (task->flags & PF_EXITING) &&
> + !(task->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP);
> +}
> +
> /* sysctls */
> extern int sysctl_oom_dump_tasks;
> extern int sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task;
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index d6ac0e3..3d1d49f 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1734,7 +1734,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
> * quickly exit and free its memory.
> */
> - if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || current->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current)) {
> set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE);
> return;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index 5340f6b..837ff31 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct task_struct *task,
> if (oom_task_origin(task))
> return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
>
> - if (task->flags & PF_EXITING && !force_kill) {
> + if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !force_kill) {
> /*
> * If this task is not being ptraced on exit, then wait for it
> * to finish before killing some other task unnecessarily.
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
> * If the task is already exiting, don't alarm the sysadmin or kill
> * its children or threads, just set TIF_MEMDIE so it can die quickly
> */
> - if (p->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> + if (task_will_free_mem(p)) {
> set_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE);
> put_task_struct(p);
> return;
> @@ -649,7 +649,7 @@ void out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> * select it. The goal is to allow it to allocate so that it may
> * quickly exit and free its memory.
> */
> - if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || current->flags & PF_EXITING) {
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current) || task_will_free_mem(current)) {
> set_thread_flag(TIF_MEMDIE);
> return;
> }
> --
> 1.5.5.1
>
>

--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/