Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: rk3x: fix bug that cause measured high_ns doesn't meet I2C spec

[Doug Anderson]

Wolfram,

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> If you don't read all the below, my belief is that we should simply
>> rename the strings in Addy's patch.  We should change "rise-ns" to
>> "i2c-scl-rising-time" and "fall-ns" to "i2c-scl-falling-time".
>> Wolfram: can you confirm this is OK?  I'm voting to leave the "-ns"
>> off the end of both to avoid asymmetry.
>
> New binding should have the "-ns" suffix, right? So, I'd vote to add the
> suffix to the new bindings and deprecate the ones used in the designware
> driver: "i2c-scl-rising-time-ns" and "i2c-scl-falling-time-ns"
>
> It might be a little more work now, but it will help us in the future,
> because it is the correct way to do it.

OK, that sounds fair.  You're OK with my proposal otherwise?

Are you looking for Addy or me to submit a patch supporting the "-ns"
suffix on the Designware i2c driver, or should we just use the "-ns"
suffix in the Rockchip driver and assume someone will later add
support for the new binding in the Designware i2c driver?

-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/