Re: [PATCH V2] cpuidle: Add missing checks to the exit condition of cpu_idle_poll()
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Jan 22 2015 - 16:01:31 EST
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> cpu_idle_poll() is entered into when either the cpu_idle_force_poll is set or
> tick_check_broadcast_expired() returns true. The exit condition from
> cpu_idle_poll() is tif_need_resched().
>
> However this does not take into account scenarios where cpu_idle_force_poll
> changes or tick_check_broadcast_expired() returns false, without setting
> the resched flag. So a cpu will be caught in cpu_idle_poll() needlessly,
> thereby wasting power. Add an explicit check on cpu_idle_force_poll and
> tick_check_broadcast_expired() to the exit condition of cpu_idle_poll()
> to avoid this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes from V1: Modified the Changelog
>
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index c47fce7..aaf1c1d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -47,7 +47,8 @@ static inline int cpu_idle_poll(void)
> rcu_idle_enter();
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(0, smp_processor_id());
> local_irq_enable();
> - while (!tif_need_resched())
> + while (!tif_need_resched() &&
> + (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()))
> cpu_relax();
> trace_cpu_idle_rcuidle(PWR_EVENT_EXIT, smp_processor_id());
> rcu_idle_exit();
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/