Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)

[Alexander Holler]

Am 04.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb LukÃÅ Czerner:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:

> > Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb LukÃÅ Czerner:
> > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not going to spend
> > > > the necessary time unpaid.
> > >
> > > Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
> > > request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
> > > it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
> >
> > Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
> > that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do that.
> >
> > I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
> >
> > I've just explained a problem.
> >
> > Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
> > fix it or by fixing it themself ...
>
> It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature.

Ok, I'm guilty.

May I ask if there's somewhere a feature request tracker which doesn't 
cruzify someone because he suggest a (maybe wrong) solution and tries to 
show that this might work with some prelimary, broken, silly, quick and 
dirty patches?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/