Re: [PATCH 1/5] WIP: Add syscall unlinkat_s (currently x86* only)

[Alexander Holler]

Am 04.02.2015 um 17:45 schrieb Alexander Holler:
> Am 04.02.2015 um 17:25 schrieb LukÃÅ Czerner:
> > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
> > > Am 04.02.2015 um 15:52 schrieb LukÃÅ Czerner:
> > > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2015, Alexander Holler wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I'm happy for all the feedback. But it doesn't help me. I'm not
> > > > > going to spend
> > > > > the necessary time unpaid.
> > > >
> > > > Right, you'd much rather have someone else to spend the time on your
> > > > request unpaid. That's understandable, but unreasonable. You want
> > > > it, implement it, or pay someone else to do it for you.
> > >
> > > Maybe you should attach a big fat red warning to the kernels bugzilla
> > > that filing a bug means either to fix it yourself or pay somone to do
> > > that.
> > >
> > > I've never demanded that someone else fixes it.
> > >
> > > I've just explained a problem.
> > >
> > > Unbelievable how someone could do such without paying someone else to
> > > fix it or by fixing it themself ...
> >
> > It's not a bug, you're requesting a feature.
>
> Ok, I'm guilty.
>
> May I ask if there's somewhere a feature request tracker which doesn't
> cruzify someone because he suggest a (maybe wrong) solution and tries to
> show that this might work with some prelimary, broken, silly, quick and
> dirty patches?

I guess the answer is FreeBSD or similiar. ;)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/