Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: add support for profiling jitted code

[Ingo Molnar]

* Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The current support only works when the runtime is 
> monitored from start to finish: perf record java 
> --agenpath:libpfmjvmti.so my_class.

Could we add '--agenpath:libpfmjvmti.so' automatically if a 
binary called 'java' is recorded?

( With a --nojavajit flag to not do that, should someone
  feel like having a 'java' executable that doesn't accept
  the --agenpath flag, or so? Assuming the major JVMs 
  accept the --agenpath flag. )

> Once the run is completed, the jitdump file needs to be 
> injected into the perf.data file. This is accomplished by 
> using the perf inject command. This will also generate an 
> ELF image for each jitted function. The inject MMAP 
> records will point to those ELF images. The reasoning 
> behind using ELF images is that it makes processing for 
> perf report and annotate automatic and transparent. It 
> also makes it easier to package and analyze on a remote 
> machine.

So it would be nice if this part was automatic, i.e. if I 
could just profile a java run with the regular perf 
profiling flow.

> The reporting is unchanged, simply invoke perf report or 
> perf annotate on the modified perf.data file. The jitted 
> code will appear symbolized and the assembly view will 
> display the instruction level profile!
> 
> As an added bonus, the series includes support for 
> demangling function signature from OpenJDK.

Cool!

> Furthermore, we believe there is a way to skip the perf 
> inject phase and have perf report/annotate directly 
> inject the MMAP records on the fly during processing of 
> the perf.data file. Perf report would also generate the 
> ELF files if necessary. Such optimization, would make 
> using this extension seamless in system-wide mode and 
> larger environments. This will be added in a later update 
> as well.

I think angling for seemless operation is really important.

> To use the new feature:
>   - compile and install the perf_posix_clock.ko module:
>     - make modules (say M to PERF_CLOCK config option)
>     - make modules_install;
>     - modprobe perf_posix_clock
>     - dmesg should say: perf_clock clock registered
>   - compile perf
>   - cd tools/perf/jvmti; make; install wherever is appropriate

Will 'make -C tools/perf install' DTRT, or is the last step 
needed separately?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/