Re: [RFC v2 3/4] locks: Split insert/delete block functions into flock/posix parts

[Daniel Wagner]

On 03/04/2015 04:00 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 03/04/2015 04:20 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>> On 03/03/2015 01:55 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> On Mon,  2 Mar 2015 15:25:12 +0100
>>> Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
> <>
>> I have fixed that stuff and now I am testing it. Though it seems
>> that there is a memory leak which can be triggered with 
>>
>> 	while true; rm -rf /tmp/a; ./lease02 /tmp/a; done
>>
>> and this happens also without any of my patches. Still trying to
>> figure out what's happening. Hopefully I just see a ghost.
>>
>> slabtop tells me that ftrace_event_field is constantly growing:
>>
> 
> check out the Kernel's leak detector it is perfect in showing you
> what was the exact call stack of the leaked memory.

Thanks for the tip. Will use it in future :)

I have done a quick bisect limit the search on fs/locks.c.
I suspect that the file_lock_context refactoring is the source of the leak.
bisect agrees with me


8634b51f6ca298fb8b07aa4847340764903533ab is the first bad commit
commit 8634b51f6ca298fb8b07aa4847340764903533ab
Author: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Jan 16 15:05:55 2015 -0500

    locks: convert lease handling to file_lock_context
    
    Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

:040000 040000 4114db9392dc4dadb30664b71a954321e5e87bab 5b9abbaf1808a7c926c09fa2164044e0cc26fd54 M      fs
:040000 040000 bd569f527a195edf673c4f7d0e80bf356c7f8d1b 6362646e04dd83efc1a9e92877900797ac879e9a M      include

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/