Re: [PATCH 07/38] perf tools: Handle indexed data file properly

[Jiri Olsa]

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:07:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> When perf detects data file has index table, process header part first
> and then rest data files in a row.  Note that the indexed sample data is
> recorded for each cpu/thread separately, it's already ordered with
> respect to themselves so no need to use the ordered event queue
> interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/session.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  tools/perf/util/session.h |  5 ++++
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> index e4f166981ff0..00cd1ad427be 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
> @@ -1300,11 +1300,10 @@ fetch_mmaped_event(struct perf_session *session,
>  #define NUM_MMAPS 128
>  #endif
>  
> -static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session,
> +static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, int fd,
>  					  u64 data_offset, u64 data_size,
>  					  u64 file_size, struct perf_tool *tool)
>  {
> -	int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session->file);

why is 'fd' passed separatelly here? we have single file now
and the only 'file::fd' we use is in session, no?

I might be missing some change in later patches ;-)

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/