Re: [PATCH] virtio: Remove virtio device during shutdown

From: Fam Zheng
Date: Thu Mar 12 2015 - 19:36:10 EST


On Thu, 03/12 17:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 06:11:35PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Wed, 03/11 10:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:09:17PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > Currently shutdown is nop for virtio devices, but the core code could
> > > > remove things behind us such as MSI-X handler etc. For example in the
> > > > case of virtio-scsi-pci, the device may still try to send interupts,
> > > > which will be on IRQ lines seeing MSI-X disabled. Those interrupts will
> > > > be unhandled, and may cause flood.
> >
> > Here is the problem I want to solve - file system driver hang:
> >
> > If a fs code happen to hit __wait_on_buffer right after pci pci_device_shutdown
> > disabled msix, it will never make progress because the requests it waits for
> > will never be completed. So the system hangs.
>
> Paolo says that pci reset of virtio scsi device guarantees
> that all outstanding requests complete.
>
> If true and implemented correctly, I don't see what else
> needs to be done.
>
> You will need to debug this some more.

First of all I was wrong about the fs driver above, scratch that, I'm sorry for
the misleading.

Regarding the hang in shutdown, Ulrich Obergfell has already pointed out that
the vcpu is "busy/stuck in interrupt processing":

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=998391 (RHBZ 1199155)

Summary: The reason it is stuck is that an IRQ from virtio-scsi-pci is not
handled. Why is there that IRQ? Because pci core code disabled msix. Why is it
not handled? Because it's done behind virtio-scsi, who still is waiting for
msix.

"Hence, the interrupt will not be acknowledged and the guest becomes flooded
with IRQ 11 interrupt."

Fortunately it's not a livelock for upstream, because of:

commit 184564efae4d775225c8fe3b762a56956fb1f827
Author: Zhang Haoyu <zhanghy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Sep 11 16:47:04 2014 +0800

kvm: ioapic: conditionally delay irq delivery duringeoi broadcast

But we still should do the shutdown right.

I also propose to not shutdown msix from pci core shutdown if the device
doesn't have shutdown function:

http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1944041.html

With that patch is applied, the "nop" .shutdown in virtio-pci shouldn't hurt
much.

Regarding handing the requests, now I don't know if we really care about them
at shutdown. As you said, waiting for requests may cause more hang.

Ideas?

Fam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/