Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] hugetlbfs: document min_size mount option

[Andrew Morton]

On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:51:22 -0700 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Nowhere here is the reader told the units of "size".  We should at
> > least describe that, and maybe even rename the thing to min_bytes.
> >
> 
> Ok, I will add that the size is in unit of bytes.  My choice of
> 'min_size' as a name for the new mount option was influenced by
> the existing 'size' mount option.  I'm open to any suggestions
> for the name of this new mount option.

Yes, due to the preexisting "size" I think we're stuck with "min_size".
We could use min_size_bytes I guess, but the operator needs to go look
up the units of "size" anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/