Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] DT: hwspinlock: Add binding documentation for Qualcomm hwmutex
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen
Date: Fri Apr 03 2015 - 09:56:33 EST
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Tim Bird <tbird20d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Sorry, I can't take this without a DT ack.
> The policy seems to be:
> "For driver (not subsystem) bindings: If you are comfortable with the
> binding, and it hasn't received an Acked-by from the devicetree
> maintainers after a few weeks, go ahead and take it."
> The syscon property is only relative to the qcom hwspinlock driver,
> (unless I'm missing something) and both Qualcomm and Sony devs are
> OK with it. So while an ACK from the DT side would be nice, I don't
> think it's required. This is exactly the type of delay that is really
> holding up a lot of out-of-tree code.
Sorry, I do prefer to make sure Mark is OK with this devicetree patch,
especially since it wasn't clear whether Mark is entirely comfortable
with it in his last response.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/