Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] i2c: davinci: use bus recovery infrastructure

[Grygorii.Strashko@xxxxxxxxxx]

On 04/06/2015 07:09 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > Of course,  i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy() has to be fixed first
> > > > as proposed by Alexander Sverdlin here:
> > > >    https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/448994/.
> > >
> > > Okay, good that you said it. So I'll give his patch series priority over
> > > this one.
> >
> >
> > Sorry, but this series already mises few merge windows and it has a lot
> > of revied-by and tested-by, so could we proceed please?
> >
> > Re-based & re-sent http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg410810.html
>
> ??? Didn't you say above that Alexaders's patch is needed first?

Sorry for misunderstanding.

I said that if We'd like to continue and optimize more recovery path
then yes - Alexaders's patch will be needed (patch 2 from his series
[PATCH 2/3] i2c: davinci: Refactor i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy(), 
which, in turn need to be rebased as the first one in his series and 
re-send). And in my opinion all such improvements could be done by 
subsequent patches.

--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/