Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL
From: Quentin Lambert
Date: Thu Apr 09 2015 - 10:34:59 EST
On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
Oh. They're not GFP_ATOMIC.The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches
really are different.
Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend.
The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second one
Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/