Re: [PATCH 2/2] ide: replace GFP_ATOMIC by GFP_KERNEL
From: Dan Carpenter
Date: Thu Apr 09 2015 - 10:40:58 EST
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 04:33:47PM +0200, Quentin Lambert wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 14:36, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >Oh. They're not GFP_ATOMIC.
> >Fold these two patches together into one patch and resend.
> The reason I did it that way is because I feel that the two patches
> really are different.
> The first one do not change the execution of the code but the second
> one does.
> Could you explain to me why they can be folded into one ?
When I read the first patch it left me with unanswered questions and I
was planning to ask you to redo it. After you had fixed 1/1 there is no
need for 2/2.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/