Re: [PATCH 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update

[Ingo Molnar]

* Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt.
> Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I:
> 1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's
>    authorship is preserved)
> 2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC
> 3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections.
>    I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch,
>    so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it.
> 
> I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between
> tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only
> part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to
> isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway.

Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing.

I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (and 
variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and 
'utilisation'.

I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling), 
because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/