Ops... I knew I was doing something wrong...
* Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,
here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt.
Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I:
1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's
authorship is preserved)
2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC
3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections.
I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch,
so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it.
I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between
tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only
part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to
isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway.
Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing.
I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (andSorry about that... I have ispell configured to use the british dictionary
variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and
'utilisation'.
I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling),
because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source.