Re: [PATCH v2] tracing: make ftrace_print_array_seq compute buf_len
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Wed Apr 29 2015 - 12:06:31 EST
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 17:02:50 +0100
Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 16:18:46 +0100
> > Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> The only caller to this function (__print_array) was getting it wrong by
> >> passing the array length instead of buffer length. As the element size
> >> was already being passed for other reasons it seems reasonable to push
> >> the calculation of buffer length into the function.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex BennÃe <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Thanks, I'll add a stable tag to this too, and get it out soon.
>
> I take it you'll pick up Dave's reviewed-by?
Yep, I will.
>
> As for CC'ing stable I wouldn't worry too much as nothing in the kernel
> uses __print_array yet (unless you count the example). But it is a
> fairly trivial patch so if you as the maintainer is happy I'm happy ;-)
OK, if it's not used, then I'll just add it to this release.
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/