Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100
>
>> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100
>>>
>>>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
>>>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
>>>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.
>>>>
>>>> Does that plan sound good to you ?
>>>
>>> It sounds good to me.
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you to
>> apply the revert, which is reminded in [1].
>
> Revert applied, thanks.

Since the required patch fixing the actual problem is now upstream,
can we revert the revert?

Caused by response time in maintainers, so a people problem, not
a technical one, sadly :/

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/