Re: [PATCH] Revert "smc91x: retrieve IRQ and trigger flags in a modern way"

[David Miller]

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 15:18:39 +0200

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 8:05 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 22:06:13 +0100
>>
>>> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx>
>>>> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 21:48:49 +0100
>>>>
>>>>> Linus has submitted the patch [1]. I'll be watching carefully until -rc4 that
>>>>> this is applied. If it's not, I'll reping you to apply this revert. Until then,
>>>>> you can forget about it, I'll do the follow-up.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that plan sound good to you ?
>>>>
>>>> It sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately Linus's patch didn't make it upstream. Therefore I'll ask you to
>>> apply the revert, which is reminded in [1].
>>
>> Revert applied, thanks.
> 
> Since the required patch fixing the actual problem is now upstream,
> can we revert the revert?

Ok, done.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/