Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature

From: SF Markus Elfring
Date: Tue May 05 2015 - 12:25:55 EST


> Then Coccinelle will find the cases where the types are wrong, rather than
> requiring a test in python.

Do you need a minus character in the first text column of the SmPL scripts then
to mark corresponding update candidates (instead of the mentioned warning printing)?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/