Re: [PATCH RFC] Coccinelle: Check for return not matching function signature

[Julia Lawall]

On Tue, 5 May 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > Then Coccinelle will find the cases where the types are wrong, rather than
> > requiring a test in python.
>
> Do you need a minus character in the first text column of the SmPL scripts then
> to mark corresponding update candidates (instead of the mentioned warning printing)?

He has a *, as he should.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/