On 05/06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
In documentation the "assigned-clock-parents" name was used when
describing the "assigned-clock-rates" property.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Looks right. The whole sentence could use some work though.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
index 06fc6d541c89..bf5b0414dc17 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ Some platforms may require initial configuration of default parent clocks
and clock frequencies. Such a configuration can be specified in a device tree
node through assigned-clocks, assigned-clock-parents and assigned-clock-rates
properties. The assigned-clock-parents property should contain a list of parent
-clocks in form of phandle and clock specifier pairs, the assigned-clock-parents
+clocks in form of phandle and clock specifier pairs, the assigned-clock-rates
property the list of assigned clock frequency values - corresponding to clocks
This half-sentence:
The assigned-clock-ratse property the list of assigned
clock frequency values
doesn't read correctly. Maybe the whole thing should be rewritten
as:
The assigned-clock-parents property should contain a list
of parent clocks in the form of a phandle and clock
specifier pair and the assigned-clock-rates property
should contain a list of frequencies in Hz. Both these
properties should correspond to the clocks listed in the
assigned-clocks property.