Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] mtrr, mm, x86: Enhance MTRR checks for KVA huge page mapping
From: Borislav Petkov
Date: Sat May 09 2015 - 05:08:24 EST
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:08:41PM -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> This patch adds an additional argument, 'uniform', to
> mtrr_type_lookup(), which returns 1 when a given range is
> covered uniformly by MTRRs, i.e. the range is fully covered
> by a single MTRR entry or the default type.
>
> pud_set_huge() and pmd_set_huge() are changed to check the
> new 'uniform' flag to see if it is safe to create a huge page
> mapping to the range. This allows them to create a huge page
> mapping to a range covered by a single MTRR entry of any
> memory type. It also detects a non-optimal request properly.
> They continue to check with the WB type since the WB type has
> no effect even if a request spans multiple MTRR entries.
>
> pmd_set_huge() logs a warning message to a non-optimal request
> so that driver writers will be aware of such a case. Drivers
> should make a mapping request aligned to a single MTRR entry
> when the range is covered by MTRRs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mtrr.h | 5 +++--
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> arch/x86/mm/pat.c | 4 ++--
> arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
> 4 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
...
> @@ -235,13 +240,19 @@ static u8 mtrr_type_lookup_variable(u64 start, u64 end, u64 *partial_end,
> * Return Values:
> * MTRR_TYPE_(type) - The effective MTRR type for the region
> * MTRR_TYPE_INVALID - MTRR is disabled
> + *
> + * Output Argument:
> + * uniform - Set to 1 when MTRR covers the region uniformly, i.e. the region
> + * is fully covered by a single MTRR entry or the default type.
I'd call this "single_mtrr". "uniform" could also mean that the resulting
type is uniform, i.e. of the same type but spanning multiple MTRRs.
> */
> -u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end)
> +u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u8 *uniform)
> {
> - u8 type, prev_type;
> + u8 type, prev_type, is_uniform, dummy;
> int repeat;
> u64 partial_end;
>
> + *uniform = 1;
> +
You're setting it here...
> if (!mtrr_state_set)
> return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
... but if you return here, you would've changed the thing uniform
points to needlessly as you're returning an error.
> @@ -253,14 +264,17 @@ u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end)
> * the variable ranges.
> */
> type = mtrr_type_lookup_fixed(start, end);
> - if (type != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID)
> + if (type != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID) {
> + *uniform = 0;
> return type;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Look up the variable ranges. Look of multiple ranges matching
> * this address and pick type as per MTRR precedence.
> */
> - type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end, &repeat);
> + type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end,
> + &repeat, &is_uniform);
>
> /*
> * Common path is with repeat = 0.
> @@ -271,16 +285,21 @@ u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end)
> while (repeat) {
> prev_type = type;
> start = partial_end;
> + is_uniform = 0;
So I think it would be better if you added an out: label where you do
exit from the function and set return values there.
So something like that, I'm pasting the whole function here so that you
can follow better:
u8 mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u8 *uniform)
{
u8 type, prev_type, is_uniform = 1, dummy;
int repeat;
u64 partial_end;
if (!mtrr_state_set)
return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
if (!(mtrr_state.enabled & MTRR_STATE_MTRR_ENABLED))
return MTRR_TYPE_INVALID;
/*
* Look up the fixed ranges first, which take priority over
* the variable ranges.
*/
type = mtrr_type_lookup_fixed(start, end);
if (type != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID) {
is_uniform = 0;
goto out;
}
/*
* Look up the variable ranges. Look of multiple ranges matching
* this address and pick type as per MTRR precedence.
*/
type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end,
&repeat, &is_uniform);
/*
* Common path is with repeat = 0.
* However, we can have cases where [start:end] spans across some
* MTRR ranges and/or the default type. Do repeated lookups for
* that case here.
*/
while (repeat) {
prev_type = type;
start = partial_end;
is_uniform = 0;
type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end,
&repeat, &dummy);
if (check_type_overlap(&prev_type, &type))
goto out;
}
if (mtrr_tom2 && (start >= (1ULL<<32)) && (end < mtrr_tom2))
type = MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;
out:
*uniform = is_uniform;
return type;
}
---
This way you're setting the uniform pointer in a single location and you're
working with the local variable inside the function.
Much easier to follow.
> +
> type = mtrr_type_lookup_variable(start, end, &partial_end,
> - &repeat);
> + &repeat, &dummy);
>
> - if (check_type_overlap(&prev_type, &type))
> + if (check_type_overlap(&prev_type, &type)) {
> + *uniform = 0;
> return type;
> + }
> }
>
> if (mtrr_tom2 && (start >= (1ULL<<32)) && (end < mtrr_tom2))
> return MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK;
>
> + *uniform = is_uniform;
> return type;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> index 35af677..372ad42 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
> @@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ static unsigned long pat_x_mtrr_type(u64 start, u64 end,
> * request is for WB.
> */
> if (req_type == _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WB) {
> - u8 mtrr_type;
> + u8 mtrr_type, uniform;
>
> - mtrr_type = mtrr_type_lookup(start, end);
> + mtrr_type = mtrr_type_lookup(start, end, &uniform);
> if (mtrr_type != MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK)
> return _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_UC_MINUS;
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> index cfca4cf..3d6edea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
> @@ -567,17 +567,18 @@ void native_set_fixmap(enum fixed_addresses idx, phys_addr_t phys,
> * pud_set_huge - setup kernel PUD mapping
> *
> * MTRR can override PAT memory types with 4KB granularity. Therefore,
> - * it does not set up a huge page when the range is covered by a non-WB
> - * type of MTRR. MTRR_TYPE_INVALID indicates that MTRR are disabled.
> + * it only sets up a huge page when the range is mapped uniformly by MTRR
> + * (i.e. the range is fully covered by a single MTRR entry or the default
> + * type) or the MTRR memory type is WB.
> *
> * Return 1 on success, and 0 when no PUD was set.
> */
> int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - u8 mtrr;
> + u8 mtrr, uniform;
>
> - mtrr = mtrr_type_lookup(addr, addr + PUD_SIZE);
> - if ((mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK) && (mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID))
> + mtrr = mtrr_type_lookup(addr, addr + PUD_SIZE, &uniform);
> + if ((!uniform) && (mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK))
> return 0;
>
> prot = pgprot_4k_2_large(prot);
> @@ -593,18 +594,22 @@ int pud_set_huge(pud_t *pud, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot)
> * pmd_set_huge - setup kernel PMD mapping
> *
> * MTRR can override PAT memory types with 4KB granularity. Therefore,
> - * it does not set up a huge page when the range is covered by a non-WB
> - * type of MTRR. MTRR_TYPE_INVALID indicates that MTRR are disabled.
> + * it only sets up a huge page when the range is mapped uniformly by MTRR
> + * (i.e. the range is fully covered by a single MTRR entry or the default
> + * type) or the MTRR memory type is WB.
> *
> * Return 1 on success, and 0 when no PMD was set.
> */
> int pmd_set_huge(pmd_t *pmd, phys_addr_t addr, pgprot_t prot)
> {
> - u8 mtrr;
> + u8 mtrr, uniform;
>
> - mtrr = mtrr_type_lookup(addr, addr + PMD_SIZE);
> - if ((mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK) && (mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_INVALID))
> + mtrr = mtrr_type_lookup(addr, addr + PMD_SIZE, &uniform);
> + if ((!uniform) && (mtrr != MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK)) {
> + pr_warn("pmd_set_huge: requesting [mem %#010llx-%#010llx], which spans more than a single MTRR entry\n",
> + addr, addr + PMD_SIZE);
> return 0;
So this returns 0, i.e. failure already. Why do we even have to warn?
Caller already knows it failed.
And this warning would flood dmesg needlessly.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/