Re: [RFC] init.h: mark init functions hot instead of cold

[Andi Kleen]

On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 12:45:01AM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> attribute((cold)) causes gcc to optimize the function for size rather
> than speed. But since __init functions will be discarded anyway, I
> don't see why memory should be a concern. On the contrary, everybody

It makes the bzImage smaller.
A lot of people on smaller systems are interested in flash size.

> wants their box to boot faster. Using the opposite attribute, hot,
> causes gcc to optimize the functions more aggressively, possibly at
> the expense of larger (.init).text. A completely unscientific test
> showed about 2% faster boot time: I booted a kernel in qemu with and
> without this patch five times each; the boot times were very stable in
> each case, so I think the 2% is ok, but of course only applies to that
> specific .config running in a virtual machine on my hardware.

2% on boot is basically noise.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/