Re: [RFC PATCH v3 30/37] perf bpf: Add bpf-loader and open ELF object files

[Jiri Olsa]

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:56:55AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:

SNIP

> +#define DEFINE_PRINT_FN(name, level) \
> +static int libbpf_##name(const char *fmt, ...)	\
> +{						\
> +	va_list args;				\
> +	int ret;				\
> +						\
> +	va_start(args, fmt);			\
> +	ret = veprintf(level, verbose, pr_fmt(fmt), args);\
> +	va_end(args);				\
> +	return ret;				\
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_PRINT_FN(warning, 0)
> +DEFINE_PRINT_FN(info, 0)
> +DEFINE_PRINT_FN(debug, 1)
> +
> +static bool libbpf_inited = false;
> +
> +#define MAX_OBJECTS	128
> +
> +struct {
> +	struct bpf_object *objects[MAX_OBJECTS];
> +	size_t nr_objects;
> +} params;

apart from that we dont like this kind of static stuff, this seems like
nice case for having simple handler like 'struct bpf_objects' carrying
the above data.. what do I miss?

also params should actually be static right?

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/