Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command

[Wolfram Sang]

> If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:

No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
apply that. However...

> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #3.10 and later
> If not, Wolfram could you do it please?

The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a
cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the
latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature