Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command

[Ludovic Desroches]

On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:36:28AM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:
> 
> No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
> apply that. However...
> 
> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #3.10 and later
> > If not, Wolfram could you do it please?
> 
> The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a
> cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the
> latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem.
> 
> 

I was thinking the same so I have tried to cherry-pick the patch on a 3.10.79
and it didn't cause any conflicts so I thought it could be sent to stable as
is.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/