Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename ia32entry.S to entry_64_compat_32.S

[Borislav Petkov]

On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:00:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme:
> 
>                   entry_32.S            # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit kernels
>                   entry_64.S            # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
>                   entry_64_compat_32.S  # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels
> 
> Another option would be:
> 
>    arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S
>    arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S
>    arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S

I like this one better because entry_64_compat_32 kinda has both bitness in
there and confuses me more.

Just my 2 Â. :)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/