Re: [RFC PATCH] Rename ia32entry.S to entry_64_compat_32.S

[H. Peter Anvin]

Call it sys if it is now only the system call entry points.  Agreed with _64_compat too.

Breaking up these snarls of spaghetti assembly will be a blessing.

On June 5, 2015 6:37:14 AM PDT, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 03:00:29PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> I'm wondering what people think about this naming scheme:
>> 
>>                   entry_32.S            # 32-bit binaries on 32-bit
>kernels
>>                   entry_64.S            # 64-bit binaries on 64-bit
>kernels
>>                   entry_64_compat_32.S  # 32-bit binaries on 64-bit
>kernels
>> 
>> Another option would be:
>> 
>>    arch/x86/entry/sys_32.S
>>    arch/x86/entry/sys_64.S
>>    arch/x86/entry/sys_64_compat.S
>
>I like this one better because entry_64_compat_32 kinda has both
>bitness in
>there and confuses me more.
>
>Just my 2 Â. :)

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/