Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] efi: arch, x86: arch, ia64: move efi_mem_attributes()

[Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong]

Sure, I will got with B with clear comment.

Thanks,
Jonathan

On 6/5/2015 2:23 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jun, at 05:09:14PM, Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback, Matt.
> >
> > Given that IA64 does not set EFI_MEMMAP, it appears to me there
> > are following options:
> > A. Keep status quota and copy x86's efi_mem_attributes() code
> > to arm64.
>
> Let's avoid this option.
>
> > B. In efi subsystem, provide week default efi_mem_attributes().
> > In the mean time, IA64 continues to have its own implementation.
>
> While I'm not a huge fan of using __weak this makes the most sense to me
> because the alternative is to rename either the ia64 or x86
> implementation and that just seems silly.
>
> > C. Add EFI_MEMMAP support (and related bits) in IA64.
>
> C. isn't an option because the ia64 memory map doesn't work the same way
> as x86 and arm64.
>
> > Which option do you prefer? Once there is a consensus, I am
> > willing to submit patch accordingly for review.
>
> Let's go with B. but please provide a comment above the weak
> implementation explaining *why* it's declared as weak and that any new
> architecture probably doesn't want to override it. Explain that the ia64
> EFI memory map is special.

--
Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/