Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq()
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sat Jun 20 2015 - 05:12:43 EST
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/20/15 10:13), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > Can you please send me the dmesg of the second patch as well?
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, what second patch?
> > The one which I forgot to append when I replied yesterday. Appended now.
> [ 0.198654] [<ffffffff8108795c>] irq_set_affinity_locked+0x5b/0xf9
> [ 0.198717] [<ffffffff81087a46>] __irq_set_affinity+0x4c/0x67
> [ 0.198781] [<ffffffff81b1d48c>] setup_ioapic_dest+0xa7/0xbf
> [ 0.198843] [<ffffffff810851a4>] ? console_unlock+0x400/0x42f
> [ 0.198906] [<ffffffff81b1b1ef>] native_smp_cpus_done+0xa4/0xae
> [ 0.198970] [<ffffffff81b2408a>] smp_init+0x75/0x7a
OK. It's setup_ioapic_dest() and I understand now where this all comes
One last request. Can you please provide /proc/timer_list and dmesg
from a mainline kernel for comparison?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/