Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq()

From: Sergey Senozhatsky
Date: Sat Jun 20 2015 - 13:55:21 EST


On (06/20/15 11:12), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
[..]
> > [ 0.198654] [<ffffffff8108795c>] irq_set_affinity_locked+0x5b/0xf9
> > [ 0.198717] [<ffffffff81087a46>] __irq_set_affinity+0x4c/0x67
> > [ 0.198781] [<ffffffff81b1d48c>] setup_ioapic_dest+0xa7/0xbf
> > [ 0.198843] [<ffffffff810851a4>] ? console_unlock+0x400/0x42f
> > [ 0.198906] [<ffffffff81b1b1ef>] native_smp_cpus_done+0xa4/0xae
> > [ 0.198970] [<ffffffff81b2408a>] smp_init+0x75/0x7a
>
> OK. It's setup_ioapic_dest() and I understand now where this all comes
> from.
>
> One last request. Can you please provide /proc/timer_list and dmesg
> from a mainline kernel for comparison?
>

sorry, was offline. sure, will send out tomorrow.

-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/