Re: [PATCH 2/2] Changes to existing files for 0PF FPGA board.

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Rob,

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Rob Landley <rob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> (Now the reason _I_ thought you'd reject it had more to do with not
>>> having converted it to device tree yet, and things on that level. But I
>>
>> Sh is an existing supported architecture, so DT is not a hard requirement.
>
> Yeah, but new board... And it's the right thing to do.

Still, people wouldn't be unhappy if you added DT support ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/