Thanks for your timely review Viresh.I think you can use STI instead.
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 22-06-15, 16:43, Lee Jones wrote:This is ST's only CPUFreq implementation and is pretty board
+config ARM_ST_CPUFREQIsn't using ST just too generic? There are multiple SoCs ST has been
+ bool "ST CPUFreq support"
involved with, I have worked on a completely different series.
Probably a more relative string is required here, like stih407 ?
agnostic. This particular driver only currently supports the STiH407
family, but internally it supports some others too. I'll have a chat
and see if we can make it more specific somehow.