Re: [PATCH 01/10] cpumask: Introduce cpumask_any_online_but

From: Vikas Shivappa
Date: Wed Jun 24 2015 - 17:14:40 EST




On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
There is currently no cpumask helper function to pick a "random" cpu
from a mask which is also online.

cpumask_any_online_but() does that which is similar to cpumask_any_but()
but also returns a cpu that is online.

Signed-off-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/cpumask.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 27e285b..ea63b65 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -548,6 +548,24 @@ static inline void cpumask_copy(struct cpumask *dstp,
#define cpumask_of(cpu) (get_cpu_mask(cpu))

/**
+ * cpumask_any_online_but - return a "random" and online cpu in a cpumask,
+ * but not this one
+ * @mask: the input mask to search
+ * @cpu: the cpu to ignore
+ *
+ * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no cpus set.
+*/
+static inline unsigned int cpumask_any_online_but(const struct cpumask *mask,
+ unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ static cpumask_t tmp;

How is that supposed to work?

You cannot expect, that all potential users of this function are
magically serialized.

I am trying do something wierd with this API. trying to do cpumask_and_any_but. But anything with 'and' operation, usually the caller supplies the dst. Guess I can remove this API altogether and 'and' the online and package cpu masks during hot cpu notifications.

Thanks,
Vikas


+
+ cpumask_and(&tmp, cpu_online_mask, mask);
+ cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &tmp);
+ return cpumask_any(&tmp);

Thanks,

tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/