[PATCH v2 04/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn()
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Jul 06 2015 - 21:24:38 EST
Turn the last pr_warn() in uprobes.c into uprobe_warn().
While at it:
- s/kzalloc/kmalloc, we initialize every member of ri
- remove the pointless comment above the obvious code
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 10 +++-------
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index eabdc21..4c941fe 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1541,9 +1541,9 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
return;
}
- ri = kzalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ri = kmalloc(sizeof(struct return_instance), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ri)
- goto fail;
+ return;
trampoline_vaddr = get_trampoline_vaddr();
orig_ret_vaddr = arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr(trampoline_vaddr, regs);
@@ -1561,8 +1561,7 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
* This situation is not possible. Likely we have an
* attack from user-space.
*/
- pr_warn("uprobe: unable to set uretprobe pid/tgid=%d/%d\n",
- current->pid, current->tgid);
+ uprobe_warn(current, "handle tail call");
goto fail;
}
@@ -1576,13 +1575,10 @@ static void prepare_uretprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
ri->chained = chained;
utask->depth++;
-
- /* add instance to the stack */
ri->next = utask->return_instances;
utask->return_instances = ri;
return;
-
fail:
kfree(ri);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/